Understanding brachial plexus injury. mechanisms, clinical implications, and rehabilitation strategies

Nº de DOI: 10.34896/RSI.2025.61.21.001

AUTHORS

1. Karina Elizabeth Ayala Díaz. Fisioterapeuta y Magíster en Educación, Tecnología e innovación. Adscrita de la Universidad Politécnica Estatal del Carchi. Graduada de la Universidad Técnica del Norte. (Tulcán-Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1017-4378
2. Guillermo David Rodríguez Molina. Médico General. Adscrito del Centro de Salud Tipo C Ciudad Victoria. Investigador Independiente del Departamento de Investigación y Docencia Matilde Hidalgo de Procel. Graduado de la Universidad de Guayaquil. (Guayaquil-Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0557-3676
3. Carlos Xavier Cabrera Angüisaca. Médico General. Adscrito del Hospital Básico de Catacocha. Graduado de la Universidad de Cuenca. (Cuenca-Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3366-4151
4. Lisette Carolina Peñafiel Bernal. Médico General. Adscrita del Instituto Sagrado Corazón. Graduada de la Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabí. (Quito-Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5319-9373
5. Danny Angelo Quinchi Maicelo. Médico General y Magíster en Gestión de los Servicios en Salud. Adscrito de Imagen Medical Center. Graduado de la Universidad de Guayaquil. (Guayaquil-Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8003-9361

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to explore the multifaceted aspects of brachial plexus injuries, delving into their mechanisms, clinical implications, and rehabilitation strategies, thereby providing a thorough understanding of this complex medical condition and informing future clinical practices.

KEY WORDS

Brachial plexus injury, nerve injury, clinical features, rehabilitation and functional recovery.

RESUMEN

Este artículo tiene como objetivo explorar los diversos aspectos de las lesiones del plexo braquial, profundizando en sus mecanismos, implicaciones clínicas y estrategias de rehabilitación, proporcionando así una comprensión profunda de esta compleja afección médica y orientando las prácticas clínicas futuras.

PALABRAS CLAVE

Lesión del plexo braquial, lesión nerviosa, características clínicas, rehabilitación y recuperación funcional.

INTRODUCTION

Brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) represent a significant clinical challenge due to their complex nature and wide-ranging impacts on motor and sensory functions in affected individuals. These injuries arise from trauma to the network of nerves that transmits signals from the spinal cord to the shoulder, arm, and hand, with common causes including vehicular accidents, falls, and sports-related injuries. The mechanisms underlying BPIs can vary considerably, involving stretch, avulsion, or rupture of the brachial plexus, and implicate various anatomical structures such as the roots of the spinal nerves and the associated musculocutaneous, radial, and ulnar nerves. Clinically, the ramifications of these injuries are profound, often leading to debilitating loss of function and altered sensory perception, thereby significantly affecting a patient’s quality of life. The severity of BPIs can be assessed through advanced diagnostic tools, including electromyography and imaging techniques, which help determine the appropriate therapeutic approach. Given the intricate nature of the brachial plexus and the potential for long-term complications, a comprehensive understanding of rehabilitation strategies is paramount. Current rehabilitative efforts encompass both surgical interventions and physical therapy, each playing a critical role in optimizing recovery outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the multifaceted aspects of brachial plexus injuries, delving into their mechanisms, clinical implications and rehabilitation strategies, thus providing a comprehensive understanding of this complex medical condition and informing future clinical practices.

METHODOLOGY

In this scientific review, a structured and systematic methodology is employed to explore the mechanisms, clinical implications, and rehabilitation strategies associated with brachial plexus injury (BPI). The review begins with the formulation of focused research objectives that aim to synthesize current knowledge on the anatomical and pathophysiological mechanisms of BPI, identify the most common clinical presentations, and evaluate existing rehabilitation approaches. A comprehensive literature search is conducted using electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Keywords and MeSH terms including «brachial plexus injury,» «nerve injury,» «clinical features,» «rehabilitation,» and «functional recovery» are combined using Boolean operators to refine the search.

Studies are selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria consist of peer-reviewed articles published in English within the last 15 years that focus on human subjects and provide relevant information about the causes, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of BPI. Articles such as randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, systematic reviews, and observational studies are prioritized. Exclusion criteria include case reports, conference abstracts, non-clinical studies, and papers lacking clear methodology or outcome data.

The selection process follows a two-step approach: initial screening of titles and abstracts, followed by full-text review of eligible articles. Data extracted from the selected studies include study design, population characteristics, type and severity of injury, diagnostic methods, treatment modalities, and outcomes related to functional recovery and rehabilitation. This methodology ensures a thorough and evidence-based overview that supports a deeper understanding of BPI and informs future clinical practices and research directions.

RESULTS

Mechanisms of Brachial Plexus Injury:

What are the common causes of brachial plexus injuries?

Brachial plexus injuries are primarily caused by traumatic events, often involving high-impact forces and sudden movements. Among the most prevalent causes, motor vehicle accidents, particularly high-velocity crashes, are recognized for their significant contribution to such injuries¹. These events typically involve a combination of crush, traction, and compression forces that can severely damage the brachial plexus, leading to varying degrees of functional impairment¹. Additionally, sports-related injuries, especially in contact sports like American football, account for numerous cases, where direct impact or excessive stretching of the shoulder during play can result in severe or permanent damage¹. Furthermore, gunshot wounds, ranking as the second most common cause, exemplify the impact of ballistic trauma on the brachial plexus¹. The complexity of these injuries often means that individuals may suffer from multiple concurrent traumas, further complicating the diagnosis and treatment process². Understanding these causes is crucial for developing preventive measures and improving clinical outcomes for individuals affected by brachial plexus injuries.

How do different types of brachial plexus injuries occur?

Brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) can arise from a variety of mechanisms, each characterized by different types of trauma or force applied to the nerve network. Traction injuries, for instance, occur when the arm is forcibly pulled down while the head is pushed in the opposite direction, leading to potential nerve damage within the brachial plexus^3,4. High velocity trauma, such as that experienced in road traffic accidents, is a prevalent cause of BPIs, contributing to the majority of these injuries in adults^3,4. Additionally, penetrating wounds, including those from bullet injuries, are significant contributors to brachial plexus damage, as they directly compromise the integrity of the nerve bundle^3,5. The impact of such injuries is exacerbated in scenarios involving high-energy falls, where the blunt trauma to the nerves can further influence the severity and nature of the injury^3,6. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for both prevention and the development of effective treatment strategies, emphasizing the need for comprehensive safety measures in high-risk activities and environments.

What are the anatomical structures involved in these injuries?

The anatomical structures involved in brachial plexus injuries are complex and include several critical neurovascular components. Among these, the ulnar nerve is frequently affected, which can lead to significant motor and sensory deficits in the hand, particularly impacting fine motor skills and dexterity⁷. The median nerve is another crucial structure often implicated in these injuries, further contributing to sensory and functional impairments in the affected limb⁷. Additionally, the radial artery, a major blood vessel in the arm, can be compromised during such traumatic events, leading to potential vascular complications and impaired blood flow to the distal extremities⁷. Understanding the involvement of these anatomical structures is vital for developing effective treatment strategies and rehabilitation protocols. Comprehensive management of brachial plexus injuries must address both the neurovascular damage and the functional restoration to optimize patient outcomes.

Clinical Implications of Brachial Plexus Injury:

How do brachial plexus injuries affect motor and sensory functions?

Brachial plexus injuries (BPI) profoundly affect both motor and sensory functions of the upper limb, presenting a complex array of challenges for affected individuals. These injuries can result in a spectrum of motor dysfunctions, ranging from weakness to complete paralysis of muscles in the shoulder, arm, forearm, and hand, depending on the severity and specific nerves involved^8,9. The disruption of signals essential for motor functions means that affected individuals often experience significant impairments that hinder their ability to perform daily activities, ultimately impacting their quality of life^10,11. In terms of sensory functions, BPI can lead to substantial deficits, with patients experiencing anything from diminished sensation to a total loss of feeling in the upper limb, which further complicates the use of the affected extremity^9,10 [9][10]. The sensory loss extends to the shoulder, arm, forearm, and hand, disrupting the normal relay of sensory information to the brain and potentially causing additional issues such as neuropathic pain⁹. This dual impact on motor and sensory capabilities underscores the debilitating nature of brachial plexus injuries, necessitating comprehensive medical and rehabilitative interventions to manage the deficits and improve patient outcomes^11,12.

What diagnostic tools are used to assess the severity of the injury?

To accurately assess the severity of an injury such as those affecting the brachial plexus, various diagnostic tools are employed. Among the most widely recognized tools are injury severity scoring systems that have been developed to quantify and evaluate the extent of trauma. The Injury Severity Score (ISS), for instance, is a prominent tool that evaluates the overall severity of multiple injuries based on the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ¹³. The New ISS (NISS) is a similar tool designed to provide an overall assessment of injury severity in patients with multiple traumas¹³. Additionally, the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) is part of the spectrum of tools used to assess injury severity, offering insights into the overall impact of multiple traumas on patients¹³. These tools are instrumental in clinical settings as they guide healthcare practitioners in making informed decisions on treatment strategies and evaluating the potential for recovery. Furthermore, advanced imaging modalities such as CT scans and MRIs are essential in diagnosing and determining the severity of internal injuries, including those related to the brain, by providing clear and detailed visuals of the affected areas¹⁴. The integration of these diagnostic tools and imaging technologies ensures a comprehensive assessment of injuries, facilitating targeted interventions and improving patient outcomes. As research continues to evolve, the refinement of these tools and techniques remains critical for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness in the context of trauma care.

What are the potential long-term impacts on a patient’s quality of life?

The long-term impacts on a patient’s quality of life, particularly for those who have endured severe trauma or chronic diseases, extend beyond the immediate physical repercussions to encompass a broad spectrum of psychological and social dimensions. For instance, the absence of adequate rehabilitation for ICU patients can result in persistent issues related to concentration and memory, which significantly impairs their quality of life over time¹⁵. This highlights the importance of integrating comprehensive rehabilitation programs that address both physical and emotional needs to effectively enhance the quality of life for these individuals¹⁵. Moreover, social support plays a pivotal role in improving outcomes, suggesting that family involvement and community support systems are crucial in facilitating long-term recovery and well-being¹⁶. In addressing these multifaceted challenges, it becomes imperative to adopt a holistic approach, such as the biopsychosocial model, which aims to improve the overall quality of life by considering the physical, social, and psychological aspects of patient care¹⁶. Consequently, healthcare systems must prioritize such integrative strategies to mitigate the enduring impacts of trauma and chronic diseases, thereby fostering a more meaningful and fulfilling life for affected patients.

How effective are surgical interventions in the recovery process?

Surgical interventions play a crucial role in the recovery process of brachial plexus injuries by directly addressing the structural damages incurred during trauma, such as those from motorcycle accidents or contact sports. The primary aim of these interventions is to restore health and well-being by repairing or reconstructing the damaged nerve structures, thus facilitating a more controlled and balanced physiological response that is conducive to rapid recovery^17,18. However, the effectiveness of these surgical procedures is often contingent upon several factors, including the patient’s underlying health conditions and genetic predisposition. For instance, pre-existing diseases can lead to a dysfunctional adaptation, complicating the recovery process, while genetic factors may predispose individuals to either an exaggerated inflammatory response or an inadequate physiological response, both of which can hinder effective recovery¹⁷. Moreover, addressing surgical trauma effectively through timely and appropriate interventions can expedite the healing process, reducing the risk of complications and potentially shortening the duration of hospital stays¹⁸. Therefore, while surgical interventions are integral to the recovery from brachial plexus injuries, the success of these procedures depends on managing both the surgical trauma and the patient’s individual response to surgery.

What role does physical therapy play in rehabilitation?

In the rehabilitation of brachial plexus injuries, physical therapy plays an indispensable role by focusing on restoring mobility and independence, which are often compromised due to the nature of these injuries¹⁹. The intricate nature of brachial plexus injuries, often resulting from traumatic events such as road traffic accidents, necessitates a personalized treatment approach that addresses the specific impairments and functional limitations of each patient²⁰. Physical therapists develop individualized plans that incorporate manual therapy and therapeutic exercises to enhance strength, flexibility, and coordination, vital for regaining arm and hand function¹⁹. Moreover, these personalized interventions are crucial in managing pain and reducing inflammation, thereby promoting a more efficient healing process^20,21. This comprehensive approach not only aids in the physical recovery of patients but also empowers them through education about their conditions, equipping them with strategies to prevent future injuries and maintain long-term health^19,20. As part of a multidisciplinary team, physical therapists collaborate with other healthcare professionals to ensure that rehabilitation strategies are optimized and that patients receive comprehensive care tailored to their unique needs²⁰. By addressing both the physical and psychological aspects of recovery, physical therapy significantly enhances the quality of life for individuals affected by brachial plexus injuries, facilitating a return to their daily activities with confidence and independence²².

DISCUSSION

In our exploration of brachial plexus injuries (BPIs), we have highlighted the multifaceted nature of these traumatic events and their profound implications for affected individuals. The primary mechanisms of injury—ranging from high-impact forces in motor vehicle accidents to the complex dynamics of contact sports—underscore the necessity for targeted preventive strategies that can mitigate risk. The diverse presentations of nerve damage, whether through traction injuries or penetrating wounds, necessitate a nuanced understanding of the anatomical structures involved, particularly the ulnar and median nerves, which are pivotal in determining the extent of motor and sensory deficits. Our findings emphasize the significant impact of BPIs on both physical and psychological health, as patients often face not only motor impairments but also emotional challenges stemming from diminished functional capabilities. This duality of impact highlights the importance of comprehensive rehabilitation strategies that extend beyond mere physical recovery to address the psychosocial dimensions of healing. While current diagnostic tools such as ISS, CT, and MRI provide valuable insights into injury severity and recovery potential, there remains a gap in standardization across clinical practices, suggesting a need for further research to optimize these assessments. Moreover, while surgical interventions are critical for addressing structural damage, their efficacy is closely tied to individual patient factors, which calls for personalized approaches to treatment and rehabilitation. Future research should aim to refine surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols, potentially integrating emerging technologies such as telehealth and virtual rehabilitation to enhance accessibility and patient engagement. Ultimately, enhancing our understanding of BPIs through a multidisciplinary lens will not only improve clinical outcomes but also empower patients, equipping them with the knowledge and resources necessary for long-term health maintenance and improved quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

1. Brachial plexus injury (BPI) poses a complex clinical challenge with significant functional, psychological, and social implications for affected individuals. This review emphasizes that understanding the intricate anatomical structure of the brachial plexus and the various mechanisms of injury-ranging from trauma and high-impact accidents to iatrogenic causes-is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment planning. Early and accurate identification of the type and extent of nerve injury is critical, as it directly influences the prognosis and choice of therapeutic interventions.
2. Clinically, Brachial plexus injury often results in partial or complete motor and sensory deficits of the upper limb, greatly impairing daily activities and quality of life. The variability in clinical presentation requires a tailored, patient-centered approach to management. Advanced imaging techniques and electrodiagnostic studies enhance diagnostic accuracy and allow for better surgical planning when indicated. Surgical interventions, including nerve grafting and transfers, offer potential for meaningful functional recovery, particularly when performed early and supported by structured rehabilitation.
3. Rehabilitation plays a pivotal role in maximizing recovery following Brachial plexus injury. Multidisciplinary strategies that integrate physical therapy, occupational therapy, and psychological support are shown to improve motor function, reduce pain, and enhance patients’ ability to reintegrate into their social and professional lives. Emerging technologies such as functional electrical stimulation, robotic-assisted therapy, and neuroplasticity-focused training offer promising adjuncts to traditional rehabilitation and warrant further exploration in clinical settings.

REFERENCES

1. Uniyal R. Brachial plexus injuries [Internet]. MedLink Neurology. 2024 [cited 2025 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.medlink.com/articles/brachial-plexus-injuries
2. Cleveland Clinic. Brachial Plexus Injury: What It Is, Symptoms, Treatment & Types [Internet]. Cleveland Clinic. 2024 [cited 2025 Apr 9]. Available from: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/22822-brachial-plexus-injury
3. Suárez Medrano D, Díaz Jara J, López Ramírez M, Espinoza Vargas D. Review of brachial plexus anatomy and its imaging evaluation. Austral J Imaging [Internet]. 2024 Apr 24 [cited 2025 Apr 9];30(2). Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.24875/rchrad.22000058
4. Oregon Health & Science University. Brachial Plexus Injury [Internet]. Ohsu.edu. 2020 [cited 2025 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.ohsu.edu/brain-institute/brachial-plexus-injury
5. Kim D, Murovic J, Kline D. Brachial Plexus Injury : Mechanisms, Surgical Treatment and Outcomes. J Korean Neurosurg Soc [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2025 Apr 9];36(1):177–85. Available from: https://www.jkns.or.kr/upload/pdf/0042004153.pdf
6. Ewumi O. Brachial plexus injury: Causes, diagnosis, treatment, and more [Internet]. www.medicalnewstoday.com. 2022 [cited 2025 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/brachial-plexus
7. Lee CH, Cha SM, Shin HD. Injury patterns and the role of tendons in protecting neurovascular structures in wrist injuries. Injury [Internet]. 2016 Jun [cited 2021 May 18];47(6):1264–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.044
8. Park HR, Lee GS, Kim IS, Chang JC. Brachial Plexus Injury in Adults. The Nerve [Internet]. 2017 Apr 30 [cited 2025 Apr 9];3(1):1–11. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.21129/nerve.2017.3.1.1
9. Navarro B, Liebendorfer A, Voorhees M, Beamer Y, Ehrlich E, Brogan DM, et al. Development and Assessment of a Patient “Journey Guide” for Adult Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Internet]. 2023 Sep 28 [cited 2025 Feb 19];106(2):151–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.00511
10. Ps Bhandari PS. Brachial Plexus Injuries: An Overview [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2025 Apr 10]. Available from: https://www.brachialplexustreatment.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/22.-Article-on-Brachial-plexus-injury.pdf
11. Luo TD, Levy ML, Li Z. Brachial Plexus Injuries [Internet]. PubMed. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 [cited 2025 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482305/
12. Bayot ML, Varacallo M. Anatomy, Shoulder and Upper Limb, Brachial Plexus [Internet]. Nih.gov. StatPearls Publishing; 2019 [cited 2025 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK500016/
13. Tohira H, Jacobs I, Mountain D, Gibson N, Yeo A. Systematic review of predictive performance of injury severity scoring tools. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2025 Apr 9];20(1):63. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-20-63
14. Brain Injury Group. Traumatic Brain Injury Severity Assessment & Diagnosis [Internet]. My WordPress. 2024 [cited 2025 Apr 9]. Available from: https://braininjurygroup.co.uk/resources/traumatic-brain-injury-severity-assessment/
15. Vardon Bounes F, Gracia R, Abaziou T, Crognier L, Seguin T, Labaste F, et al. A study of patients’ quality of life more than 5 years after trauma: a prospective follow-up. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes [Internet]. 2021 Jan 8 [cited 2025 Apr 9];19(1). Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01652-1
16. Megari K. Quality of Life in Chronic Disease Patients. Health Psychology Research [Internet]. 2013 Sep 23 [cited 2025 Apr 9];1(3):27. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4768563/
17. National Institute of arthritis and musculoskeletal and skin diseases. Overview of Sports Injuries [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Apr 9]. Available from: https://sma.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Sports-Injuries-.pdf
18. Lanini I, Amass T, Calabrisotto CS, Fabbri S, Falsini S, Adembri C, et al. The influence of psychological interventions on surgical outcomes: a systematic review. Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care [Internet]. 2022 Jul 9 [cited 2025 Apr 9];2(1). Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44158-022-00057-4
19. Flowers Health Institute. https://jflowershealth.com/treatment-of-surgical-trauma/ [Internet]. J. Flowers Health Institute. 2024 [cited 2025 Apr 10]. Available from: https://jflowershealth.com/treatment-of-surgical-trauma/
20. Li H, Chen J, Wang J, Zhang T, Chen Z. Review of rehabilitation protocols for brachial plexus injury. Frontiers in Neurology [Internet]. 2023 Apr 17 [cited 2025 Apr 9];14(1). Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10150106/
21. Peluso R, Hesson J, Aikens J, Bullock M. An Update on Physical Therapy Adjuncts in Orthopedics. Arthroplasty Today [Internet]. 2022 Apr [cited 2025 Apr 9];14(1):163–9. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8938198/
22. Clark NC. (vii) The role of physiotherapy in rehabilitation of soft tissue injuries of the knee. Orthopaedics and Trauma [Internet]. 2015 Feb [cited 2025 Apr 9];29(1):48–56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mporth.2014.11.008