Comprehensive evaluation of obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound techniques and their clinical applications

Nº de DOI: 10.34896/RSI.2026.82.33.001

AUTHORS

1. Nohelia Maricela Feijóo Villa. General Practitioner. Attached to Teófilo Dávila General Hospital. Graduate of the University of Guayaquil. (Piñas, Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5641-3515
2. Gabriela Estefanía Flores Chávez. General Practitioner. Attached to the Praxxel Medical Specialities Clinic. ⁠Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador. (Tumbaco, Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1856-5275
3. Luis Roberto Ordeñana Robles. General Practitioner. Attached to Private Clinics of Ecuador. Graduate of the State University of Guayaquil. (Guayaquil, Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9359-8386
4. Juan Carlos Macas Chocho. General Practitioner. Attached to Julius Doepfner Hospital. Graduate of the National University of Loja. (Loja, Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6728-0908
5. Daniela Fernanda Guaman Ayala. General Practitioner. Attached to the Santa María Clinic. Graduate of the Particular Technical University of Loja. (Loja, Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9283-9900

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to comprehensively evaluate the latest developments in obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound techniques, explore their clinical applications, and analyze how these innovations are shaping patient management, with a focus on maximizing diagnostic efficacy while addressing current limitations and future prospects in this rapidly evolving field.

KEY WORDS

Obstetric ultrasound, gynecologic ultrasound, 3D ultrasound, 4D ultrasound, doppler ultrasound, fetal imaging.

RESUMEN

Este artículo tiene como objetivo evaluar de manera integral los últimos avances en las técnicas de ultrasonido obstétrico y ginecológico, explorar sus aplicaciones clínicas y analizar cómo estas innovaciones están influyendo en el manejo de los pacientes, con especial énfasis en maximizar la eficacia diagnóstica mientras se abordan las limitaciones actuales y las perspectivas futuras en este campo en rápida evolución.

PALABRAS CLAVE

Ultrasonido obstétrico, ultrasonido ginecológico, ultrasonido 3D, ultrasonido 4D, ultrasonido Doppler, imagen fetal.

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasound imaging has become an indispensable tool in obstetrics and gynecology, offering a non-invasive, real-time window into the complex processes of fetal development and female reproductive health. Over recent decades, technological advancements have significantly enhanced the resolution, accuracy, and diagnostic capabilities of ultrasound modalities, facilitating earlier detection of fetal anomalies, better assessment of placental and fetal well-being, and more precise evaluation of gynecologic conditions. Innovations such as three-dimensional (3D) and four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound have revolutionized prenatal diagnostics by providing detailed spatial visualization and dynamic fetal movements, thereby improving the detection of structural abnormalities and aiding in comprehensive fetal assessments. Similarly, Doppler ultrasound techniques have evolved to allow clinicians to monitor fetal blood flow and placental circulation effectively, offering vital information for managing high-risk pregnancies. In the realm of gynecology, transvaginal ultrasound has become the gold standard for early detection of gynecologic pathologies, including ovarian cysts, fibroids, and endometrial abnormalities, while contrast-enhanced ultrasound techniques are emerging as valuable tools for characterizing pelvic masses and improving diagnostic specificity. These technological advances have a profound impact on clinical decision-making, influencing treatment plans, surgical interventions, and patient counseling, yet they also pose challenges related to interpretation accuracy, operator expertise, and equipment limitations, especially in complex cases.

OBJECTIVE

Comprehensively evaluate the latest advances in obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound techniques, explore their clinical applications, and analyze how these innovations are shaping patient care, focusing on maximizing diagnostic efficacy while addressing current limitations and future prospects in this rapidly evolving field.

METHODOLOGY

This narrative review was conducted to synthesize current advancements in obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound techniques, emphasizing technological innovations, clinical applications, and their impact on patient management. A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and IEEE Xplore, covering the period from 2000 to 2024 to capture both foundational studies and the latest diagnostic developments.

Search terms included combinations of: “obstetric ultrasound,” “gynecologic ultrasound,” “3D ultrasound,” “4D ultrasound,” “Doppler ultrasound,” “fetal imaging,” “contrast-enhanced ultrasound,” “MRI fetal imaging,” “DTI,” “MRS,” “fetal brain development,” “pelvic ultrasound,” “transvaginal ultrasound,” “reproductive medicine imaging,” and “prenatal diagnosis.” Reference lists of selected articles were additionally screened to capture relevant studies not identified in the initial search.

Inclusion criteria comprised:

1. Peer-reviewed articles, systematic reviews, guidelines, clinical trials, and technological reports related to obstetric or gynecologic ultrasound.
2. Studies focusing on technological advancements, diagnostic accuracy, fetal or gynecologic assessment, or clinical outcomes.
3. English-language publications with adequate methodological detail.

Exclusion criteria included:

1. Case reports, commentary articles, or studies with insufficient diagnostic relevance.
2. Publications that exclusively explored non-ultrasound imaging techniques without integration into obstetric or gynecologic decision-making.

Data were extracted and synthesized according to thematic categories: (1) advances in fetal imaging technologies, (2) diagnostic contributions of 3D/4D modalities, (3) Doppler ultrasound in fetal hemodynamic assessment, (4) innovations in gynecologic imaging including transvaginal ultrasound and CEUS, and (5) clinical implications for treatment decisions and reproductive medicine. Due to heterogeneity in methods and outcomes among included studies, no meta-analysis was performed. The narrative synthesis approach enabled integration of technological, clinical, and interpretative perspectives central to this rapidly evolving field.

RESULTS

Advances in Obstetric Ultrasound Techniques:

What are the latest developments in fetal imaging technologies?

Recent developments in fetal imaging technologies have dramatically broadened clinicians’ capacity to diagnose, monitor, and understand fetal development, with advances integrating across multiple domains to yield earlier and more precise detection of congenital anomalies and fetal conditions¹. Among the most significant innovations is the expansion of advanced MRI modalities such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), MR spectroscopy (MRS), and functional MRI (fMRI), which have enabled detailed quantitative analysis of brain maturation, functional connectivity, and tissue microstructure in-utero². These MRI advancements, coupled with improvements in motion correction and automatic segmentation, now support large-scale population studies and facilitate the creation of comprehensive fetal brain atlases, further enhancing the examination of normal and abnormal brain development². Simultaneously, ultrasound technology has evolved with higher resolution and volumetric imaging, allowing sonographers to visualize minute anatomical details of the fetal brain and heart—regions previously difficult to assess—while fetal doppler imaging delivers dynamic insights into blood flow and vascular function^3,4. The synergy of these innovations not only advances the diagnostic accuracy and monitoring of fetal well-being but also underpins personalized care strategies and holds the promise of improved neonatal outcomes, highlighting the urgent need for continued multidisciplinary research and widespread adoption of these technologies in clinical practice^2,5,6.

How do 3D and 4D ultrasound improve prenatal diagnostics?

Building on the foundation of advanced fetal imaging, the integration of 3D and 4D ultrasound technologies has revolutionized prenatal diagnostics by providing clearer and more detailed views of fetal anatomy and development, which far surpass the capabilities of traditional 2D ultrasound systems^7,8. With high-definition imaging, healthcare providers are able to conduct more comprehensive and accurate assessments, leading to earlier detection of abnormalities such as cleft lip, congenital heart defects, and other structural anomalies⁷. The use of real-time 3D (4D) ultrasound further enhances these benefits by offering dynamic visualization of fetal movement and behavior, enabling clinicians to assess function as well as form and affording parents an opportunity to witness their child’s development in unprecedented detail^7,9. These advancements not only improve the accuracy of prenatal diagnostics but also foster greater peace of mind for expectant parents, as the ability to see detailed images and real-time videos of the fetus offers reassurance and a more informed pregnancy journey⁷. Consequently, the improved diagnostic precision and emotional support provided by 3D and 4D ultrasound highlight the necessity of continued investment in and accessibility to these advanced imaging technologies for optimal maternal and fetal health outcomes.

What are the benefits and limitations of Doppler ultrasound in monitoring fetal health?

Doppler ultrasound stands out as a crucial tool in the broader landscape of fetal monitoring, specifically due to its capacity to deliver real-time insights into fetal and placental blood flow, which is vital for the management of high-risk pregnancies¹⁰. By enabling the detection of the fetal heartbeat as early as 12 weeks and providing detailed assessments of blood flow, Doppler ultrasound empowers healthcare professionals to identify and respond to potential complications such as fetal anemia or placental insufficiency, thereby facilitating timely interventions that can significantly improve maternal and neonatal outcomes^10,11. Furthermore, this modality’s non-invasive nature makes it an attractive diagnostic approach, minimizing risk to both mother and fetus while enabling ongoing surveillance throughout gestation¹⁰. However, the effectiveness of Doppler ultrasound is closely linked to the operator’s expertise; inaccurate use can lead to false positives or missed diagnoses, highlighting a critical limitation in clinical application¹⁰. In addition, while Doppler ultrasound is indispensable for monitoring hemodynamic parameters, it cannot detect certain structural or chromosomal problems that may be identified through other imaging modalities, underscoring the need for a complementary, multimodal approach to prenatal care¹¹. Given these interconnected benefits and limitations, it is imperative to ensure the procedure is conducted by trained professionals and integrated with other diagnostic tools to maximize its utility and safety in fetal health monitoring.

Innovations in Gynecologic Ultrasound Approaches:

How is transvaginal ultrasound utilized for early detection of gynecologic conditions?

Transvaginal ultrasound stands as a cornerstone in the early detection of gynecologic conditions due to its ability to generate high-resolution images of the female pelvic organs, including the uterus, ovaries, cervix, fallopian tubes, and vagina^12,13. By employing high-frequency sound waves, this non-invasive procedure produces detailed cross-sectional images that enable clinicians to identify structural abnormalities such as cysts, fibroids, or other pathological changes that may underlie symptoms like pelvic pain, abnormal bleeding, or infertility¹². The detailed visualization afforded by transvaginal ultrasound not only aids in the detection of common gynecological issues but also facilitates the identification of more serious conditions, such as uterine cancer, cervical abnormalities, and infections at a stage when intervention can be most effective¹³. Furthermore, the capability to locate intrauterine devices (IUDs) and monitor their positioning underscores the interconnection between reproductive health management and the early identification of complications that could compromise patient outcomes¹². Given its safety profile—lacking ionizing radiation and being well-tolerated by patients—transvaginal ultrasound is uniquely positioned to be both a first-line diagnostic tool and a method for ongoing surveillance of gynecologic health¹³. To maximize its impact, continued investment in practitioner training, patient education, and access to this technology is essential, ensuring that early detection translates into improved long-term outcomes for women’s reproductive health.

What role does ultrasound play in the assessment of pelvic masses?

Ultrasound plays a pivotal role in the assessment of pelvic masses by serving as the primary imaging modality for initial evaluation, diagnosis, and ongoing monitoring of lesions within the female pelvis^14,15. Its widespread use is attributed to its accessibility, noninvasive nature, and high diagnostic value, making it indispensable for clinicians confronted with patients presenting with pelvic pain or suspected masses^14,16. Both transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound techniques are integral to this process, as their complementary views provide a more comprehensive assessment of pelvic structures, enabling clinicians to delineate the exact location, size, number, and appearance of masses with greater accuracy^14,16. The detailed information provided in an ultrasound report—including the dimensions, consistency, laterality, internal and external wall characteristics, and the presence or absence of pelvic fluid—not only aids in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions but also guides subsequent clinical management and intervention strategies^15,16. Importantly, the close correlation between sonographic findings and the gross morphological features of pelvic masses enhances diagnostic confidence and informs multidisciplinary decision-making¹⁶. This interconnection between precise imaging, accurate characterization, and informed management underscores the need for continued investment in operator training and technology upgrades to maximize the diagnostic and therapeutic benefits of pelvic ultrasound in patient care.

How are contrast-enhanced ultrasound techniques applied in gynecology?

Building upon the foundational role of advanced ultrasound technologies in gynecology, the application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) techniques represents a significant advancement in diagnostic precision. The process typically begins with a routine baseline ultrasound to precisely locate the area of concern and document initial findings, ensuring that any subsequent changes can be accurately attributed to the effects of the contrast agent rather than pre-existing imaging artifacts¹⁷. Following this, a contrast agent is administered, which allows for enhanced visualization of tissue vascularity, lesion characterization, and the assessment of blood flow in real time¹⁷. Subsequently, a second ultrasound examination is performed to capture the contrast-enhanced images, which provide critical data for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions, monitoring tumor response to therapy, and guiding interventional procedures¹⁷. This sequential approach not only improves diagnostic accuracy but also facilitates more tailored and timely therapeutic interventions, underscoring the need for wider adoption and ongoing refinement of CEUS protocols in gynecologic practice.

Clinical Applications and Impact on Patient Management:

How do ultrasound findings influence obstetric and gynecologic treatment decisions?

Ultrasound findings serve as a pivotal influence on obstetric and gynecologic treatment decisions by providing real-time, detailed visualization of both fetal and maternal anatomy, which fundamentally shapes clinical management strategies. The ability of advanced ultrasound technology to produce highly realistic and three-dimensional images not only enhances diagnostic accuracy but also strengthens the perception of the fetus as a distinct individual, thereby affecting how both healthcare providers and pregnant individuals approach care and make decisions regarding the pregnancy¹⁸. This personification of the fetus is further amplified through ultrasound imaging, which can lead to scenarios where treatment decisions increasingly prioritize fetal interests, occasionally at the expense of the pregnant individual’s rights and overall well-being¹⁸. For instance, when ultrasound confirms fetal malpresentation or abnormal lie, these findings directly inform the choice of delivery method, such as opting for a cesarean section over vaginal birth, to optimize outcomes for both mother and child¹⁹. Moreover, the visualization of placental location and assessment of fetal growth and well-being via ultrasound not only guide the timing and method of labor induction but also inform decisions about the management of high-risk pregnancies, such as those involving placental abnormalities or intrauterine growth restriction¹⁹. These interconnections between the technological capabilities of ultrasound, the evolving perceptions of fetal autonomy, and the clinical imperatives of maternal-fetal medicine highlight the centrality of ultrasound in balancing complex, sometimes conflicting, interests in obstetric and gynecologic care. It is therefore essential that practitioners remain vigilant about these dynamics, ensuring that treatment decisions are both evidence-based and ethically sound, with ongoing attention to the rights and well-being of all individuals involved.

What are the challenges in interpreting ultrasound results in complex cases?

Interpreting ultrasound results in complex cases is fraught with multifaceted challenges that stem from both technical limitations and clinical intricacies. One major difficulty arises when anatomical structures are not clearly delineated; for instance, the borders and landmarks within ultrasound images can often be ambiguous, leading to uncertainty about the precise location or nature of a suspected anomaly²⁰. This challenge is exacerbated by morphological changes induced by underlying diseases, such as cardiac failure, which can alter the appearance of organs like the gallbladder, thereby complicating the interpretation and risking misdiagnosis²¹. Additionally, technical artifacts further complicate the process: shadowing beneath tissue interfaces may obscure crucial underlying structures, while echoes may appear in incorrect positions, resulting in potential misidentification of organs or pathologies²⁰. The fusion of anatomically distinct structures can also lead to confusion, as it may be difficult to distinguish individual tissues or organs when they appear confluent on the scan²⁰. Given these interrelated challenges, it is essential that clinicians integrate ultrasound findings within the broader clinical context of the patient, using additional diagnostic modalities when necessary to confirm or refute initial impressions²¹. Addressing these obstacles requires continued advancements in imaging technology, enhanced training for clinicians, and the development of robust protocols that emphasize the importance of correlating ultrasound results with other clinical information to ensure accurate and reliable diagnoses.

How does ultrasound improve patient outcomes in reproductive medicine?

Building on the enhanced visualization provided by 3D and 4D ultrasound, the integration of advanced ultrasound techniques into reproductive medicine extends well beyond fetal imaging, encompassing comprehensive assessments of reproductive organs and facilitating precise diagnoses in infertility evaluations and gynecologic conditions. For instance, ultrasound imaging supplies clinicians with a thorough view of the female pelvis, enabling the identification of uterine abnormalities, ovarian cysts, and fibroids, which are critical factors in both infertility and broader gynecologic health²². This detailed anatomical information not only aids in early detection and intervention but also supports the planning of targeted treatments, directly impacting patient outcomes by reducing time to diagnosis and improving the efficacy of subsequent therapies²². Furthermore, the use of 3D ultrasound allows for meticulous evaluation of ovarian reserve and endometrial cavity, optimizing fertility treatment protocols and embryo transfer procedures to increase the likelihood of successful pregnancies²². The synergy between diagnostic and procedural applications of ultrasound, therefore, creates a continuum of care that promotes personalized and evidence-based interventions across diverse reproductive health scenarios. To maximize these benefits, ongoing investment in technological advancements and provider training is essential, ensuring that patients continue to receive the highest standard of care throughout their reproductive journeys.

DISCUSSION 

The advancements in obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound technologies delineated in this study underscore a significant leap forward in prenatal and reproductive healthcare. The integration of high-resolution 3D and 4D ultrasound modalities, coupled with sophisticated Doppler imaging, has markedly improved the detection of structural anomalies and enabled real-time functional assessments of fetal movements and blood flow, thereby facilitating earlier diagnosis and intervention. Moreover, the incorporation of complementary MRI techniques such as DTI, MRS, and fMRI has provided unprecedented insights into fetal brain development, tissue microstructure, and functional connectivity, enriching our understanding of fetal neurodevelopment and supporting large-scale population studies. These technological innovations hold promise for personalized patient management, yet their implementation is not without limitations. Operator dependency remains a concern, especially for Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasound, where expertise significantly influences diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, artifacts, ambiguous borders, and morphological changes due to disease pose ongoing challenges in image interpretation, emphasizing the need for ongoing training and possibly the integration of multimodal imaging approaches. While these advancements have improved diagnostic precision, gaps remain in detecting certain chromosomal abnormalities and subtle structural anomalies, highlighting the ongoing necessity for adjunctive diagnostic tools such as genetic testing. Future research should focus on refining imaging protocols, enhancing the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound modalities, and developing standardized guidelines for their clinical application. Furthermore, addressing disparities in access to advanced imaging technologies is crucial to ensure equitable healthcare outcomes. Overall, the continuous evolution of ultrasound and MRI technologies, paired with multidisciplinary collaboration, will be vital in advancing obstetric and gynecologic care, ultimately aiming to optimize maternal and neonatal health outcomes while acknowledging the current limitations that must be addressed to fully realize their potential.

CONCLUSIONS

Technological advancements in obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound have transformed modern reproductive healthcare by dramatically improving diagnostic precision, early detection of anomalies, and clinical decision-making. High-resolution 3D and 4D ultrasound modalities now allow detailed visualization of fetal structures and dynamic movements, facilitating earlier and more accurate prenatal diagnoses. Doppler imaging has become indispensable for assessing fetal and placental hemodynamics, particularly in high-risk pregnancies where changes in blood flow carry critical prognostic implications.

The integration of advanced MRI modalities—including DTI, MRS, and fMRI—has opened new avenues for understanding fetal neurodevelopment, enabling comprehensive assessment of tissue microstructure and functional connectivity. In gynecology, transvaginal ultrasound remains the gold standard for early detection of pelvic disorders, while contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is emerging as a powerful tool for characterizing vascular patterns and differentiating benign from malignant lesions.

Despite these advancements, significant challenges persist. Ultrasound remains highly operator-dependent, and complex cases may be confounded by artifacts, ambiguous anatomical borders, or disease-related morphological alterations. Furthermore, certain chromosomal and subtle structural abnormalities may elude detection using ultrasound alone, underscoring the need for complementary diagnostic tools such as MRI and genetic testing. Access disparities also limit the widespread adoption of advanced imaging technologies in low-resource settings.

REFERENCES

1. Parra Saavedra MA. Fetal therapy and interventions. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology [Internet]. 2025 Sep 1 [cited 2025 Sep 5];66(S1):201–18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.70085
2. Calixto C, Taymourtash A, Karimi D, Snoussi H, Velasco-Annis C, Jaimes C, et al. Advances in Fetal Brain Imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America [Internet]. 2024 Apr 29 [cited 2024 Dec 1];32(3):459–78. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2024.03.004
3. CardiacDirect. Advancements in Fetal Monitoring Technology [Internet]. CardiacDirect. 2024 [cited 2024 Dec 5]. Available from: https://www.cardiacdirect.com/advancements-in-fetal-monitor-technology/?srsltid=AfmBOorx-muR9PBvoZ_Uczh4pP0tTCmA2jAEZzjI9Ou2Z-snH0Lpetnt
4. Fetal Vision Imaging. The Latest Advancements in Ultrasound Technology [Internet]. Fetal Vision Imaging. 2022 [cited 2024 Dec 4]. Available from: https://fetalvisionimaging.com/the-latest-advancements-in-ultrasound-technology/
5. Dong SZ, Matthew J. Advancements in fetal imaging and diagnostics [Internet]. SpringerLink. Springer Nature; 2024 [cited 2024 Dec 5]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/collections/cjdcfijhed
6. Reddy UM, Abuhamad AZ, Levine D, Saade GR. Fetal imaging: Executive Summary of a Joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging Workshop. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [Internet]. 2014 May [cited 2019 Dec 7];210(5):387–97. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.02.028
7. Rajamani A, Bharadwaj PA, Hariharan S, Ragavan AV, Hassan A, Arvind H, et al. A historical timeline of the development and evolution of medical diagnostic ultrasonography. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound [Internet]. 2024 Sep 3 [cited 2024 Dec 4];52(9). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23808
8. BabyCenter. 3D and 4D ultrasound during pregnancy | BabyCenter [Internet]. BabyCenter. 2022 [cited 2024 Dec 4]. Available from: https://www.babycenter.com/pregnancy/health-and-safety/3d-and-4d-ultrasound_40007980
9. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for Diagnostic Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation [Internet]. www.acog.org. 2017 [cited 2024 Dec 4]. Available from: https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2017/10/guidelines-for-diagnostic-imaging-during-pregnancy-and-lactation
10. Farooq M, Ma′ajeni E, Messawa M, Ayaz A, Daghistani M. The role of doppler ultrasound in high risk pregnancy: A comparative study. Nigerian Medical Journal [Internet]. 2012 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Dec 4];53(3):116–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/0300-1652.104377
11. Wallis M. At-home fetal Doppler: Safety and how to use [Internet]. www.medicalnewstoday.com. 2020 [cited 2025 Dec 4]. Available from: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/at-home-fetal-doppler
12. Glowm. Stepwise Standardized Approach to the Basic Ultrasound Examination of the Female Pelvis [Internet]. Glowm.com. 2019 [cited 2024 Dec 4]. Available from: https://www.glowm.com/pdf/Ultrasound_in_obstetrics_and_gynecology-chapter14.pdf
13. Cleveland Clinic. Transvaginal Ultrasound: Purpose, Procedure & What To Expect [Internet]. Cleveland Clinic. 2022 [cited 2024 Dec 4]. Available from: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/4993-transvaginal-ultrasound
14. Kumsa MJ, Haile ZW. The Role of Ultrasound in Women’s Health. IntechOpen eBooks [Internet]. 2023 Aug 1 [cited 2024 Dec 4];1(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.111821
15. Saifi A, Karikazi M, Shetty D. Role of sonography in the assessment of pelvic masses in women and its histopathological correlation. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences [Internet]. 2022 Sep 16 [cited 2024 Feb 25];10(10):2156–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20222360
16. Cancer Therapy Advisor. Adnexal/pelvic mass [Internet]. Cancer Therapy Advisor. 2019 [cited 2024 Dec 4]. Available from: https://www.cancertherapyadvisor.com/home/decision-support-in-medicine/obstetrics-and-gynecology/adnexal-pelvic-mass/
17. Cleveland Clinic. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) [Internet]. Cleveland Clinic. 2022 [cited 2024 Dec 4]. Available from: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/22754-contrast-enhanced-ultrasound-ceus
18. Favaretto M, Rost M. “A Picture Paints a Thousand Words”—A Systematic Review of the Ethical Issues of Prenatal Ultrasound. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry [Internet]. 2024 Aug 19 [cited 2024 Dec 4];22(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-024-10360-0
19. 19.Wiafe YA, Odoi AT, Dassah ET. The Role of Obstetric Ultrasound in Reducing Maternal and Perinatal Mortality. Ultrasound Imaging – Medical Applications [Internet]. 2011 Aug 23 [cited 2020 Oct 10];1(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.5772/22847
20. Vega R, Dehghan M, Nagdev A, Buchanan B, Kapur J, Jaremko JL, et al. Overcoming barriers in the use of artificial intelligence in point of care ultrasound. npj Digital Medicine [Internet]. 2025 Apr 19 [cited 2025 Sep 4];8(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01633-y
21. Blanco P, Volpicelli G. Common pitfalls in point-of-care ultrasound: a practical guide for emergency and critical care physicians. Critical Ultrasound Journal [Internet]. 2016 Oct 26 [cited 2024 Dec 4];8(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-016-0052-x
22. Stadtmauer L, Tur-Kaspa I. Ultrasound Imaging in Reproductive Medicine. Springer eBooks. Springer Nature; 2013.