The cultural, medical, and ethical implications of circumcision. A comprehensive analysis of practices and perspectives

Nº de DOI: 10.34896/RSI.2025.76.50.001

AUTHORS

1. Jorge Andrés Zambrano Zambrano. General Practitioner. Attached to Gustavo Domínguez Zambrano Hospital. Independent Researcher of the Department of Research and Teaching Matilde Hidalgo of Procel. Graduate of the University of Guayaquil. (Santo Domingo-Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7834-5795
2. Pablo Andres Montaño Ucho. General Practitioner, Attached to the Pablo Jaramillo Crespo Humanitarian Hospital Foundation, Graduated from the University of Cuenca. (⁠Cuenca-Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5216-3561
3. Bryan Adrián Espin Taguada. General Practitioner, Attached to MEDIQX, Graduate of the Central University of Ecuador., (⁠Quito-Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0981-5372
4. Esthela Lorena Castellano Bohórquez. General Practitioner. Attached to the IESS Sur General Hospital. Graduated from the Central University of Ecuador. (⁠Quito-Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7657-4372
5. Fabricio Josue Ruiz Procel. General Practitioner. Attached to the Urological Team. Graduated from the Catholic University of Cuenca. (⁠Machala-Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4725-6326

ABSTRACT

Circumcision, a practice that has elicited diverse opinions and practices across the globe, serves as a focal point for examining a myriad of cultural, medical, and ethical implications. Historically rooted in various societies, circumcision has been associated with religious rites, cultural identity, and community belonging, with its origins tracing back thousands of years to civilizations such as ancient Egypt and the Hebrew culture.

KEY WORDS

Circumcision and cultural practices, medical benefits and risks of circumcision, ethical considerations of circumcision, and circumcision and human rights.

RESUMEN

La circuncisión, una práctica que ha suscitado diversas opiniones y prácticas en todo el mundo, sirve como punto focal para examinar un sinfín de implicaciones culturales, médicas y éticas. Históricamente arraigada en diversas sociedades, la circuncisión se ha asociado con ritos religiosos, identidad cultural y pertenencia comunitaria, y sus orígenes se remontan a miles de años en civilizaciones como el antiguo Egipto y la cultura hebrea.

PALABRAS CLAVE

Circuncisión y prácticas culturales, beneficios médicos y riesgos de la circuncisión, consideraciones éticas de la circuncisión y circuncisión y derechos humanos.

INTRODUCTION

As a result, the perception of circumcision varies significantly, with some cultures embracing it as a rite of passage, while others view it as a medical necessity or a contentious ethical issue. From a medical standpoint, the debate surrounding circumcision encompasses a spectrum of benefits and risks, influencing the perspectives of healthcare professionals and parents alike. Proponents argue that circumcision can lead to reduced risks of urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted infections, and certain forms of cancer, while detractors highlight potential complications, ethical concerns regarding consent, and the importance of bodily autonomy. Furthermore, the long-term health outcomes of circumcision remain a subject of extensive research, with studies yielding mixed conclusions that contribute to an ongoing dialogue in the medical community. By analyzing these multifaceted implications of circumcision, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how cultural beliefs, medical evidence, and ethical considerations intertwine, ultimately shaping practices and perspectives surrounding this complex procedure.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive understanding of how cultural beliefs, medical evidence and ethical considerations intertwine, ultimately shaping practices and perspectives around this complex procedure.

METHODOLOGY

This scientific review adopts a comprehensive and interdisciplinary approach to analyzing the cultural, medical, and ethical implications of circumcision. A systematic literature search is conducted using academic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify peer-reviewed articles, clinical studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published in the last two decades. The search strategy includes keywords such as “circumcision and cultural practices”, “medical benefits and risks of circumcision”, “ethical considerations of circumcision” and “circumcision and human rights” to ensure a broad yet focused exploration of the topic.

The review is structured into three main sections: cultural perspectives, medical implications, and ethical considerations. The first section examines the historical and cultural significance of circumcision across different societies, religious traditions, and geographical regions. Anthropological and sociological studies are analyzed to understand the role of circumcision in identity formation, social belonging, and ritualistic practices. Special attention is given to how cultural perceptions of circumcision influence public health policies and parental decision-making.

The second section evaluates the medical aspects of circumcision, including its potential health benefits and associated risks. Studies on the role of circumcision in reducing the transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV, are critically examined. Additionally, research on urinary tract infections, penile cancer prevention, and hygiene benefits is reviewed to assess the clinical justifications for the procedure. Conversely, the risks of circumcision, such as surgical complications, pain, and psychological effects, are analyzed to provide a balanced perspective on the medical implications. Pediatric and adult circumcision outcomes are compared to highlight differences in risks and benefits across age groups.

The third section explores the ethical debates surrounding circumcision, particularly in the context of autonomy, consent, and human rights. Bioethical literature and legal frameworks are reviewed to assess arguments for and against non-therapeutic circumcision, particularly in infants and minors. Discussions on bodily integrity, religious freedom, and medical necessity are examined to provide a nuanced understanding of the ethical dilemmas posed by circumcision. Policies and regulations from different countries are compared to identify global trends and variations in legal and medical perspectives.

By integrating medical, cultural, and ethical perspectives, this review aims to provide a well-rounded analysis of circumcision and its implications. The findings contribute to a more informed discussion on the practice, helping healthcare professionals, policymakers, and the general public navigate the complexities surrounding circumcision. The review also highlights areas where further research is needed to bridge knowledge gaps and improve decision-making regarding this deeply rooted and often controversial procedure.

RESULTS

Cultural Implications of Circumcision:

How do different cultures perceive and practice circumcision?

Cultural patterns play a crucial role in shaping individuals’ perceptions and constructions of reality regarding circumcision practices¹. For instance, family backgrounds and cultural contexts lead to diverse beliefs and practices concerning circumcision among parents, resulting in a complex decision-making process that is influenced by both traditional values and contemporary cultural norms¹. This diversity is evident in how different cultures have varying definitions and interpretations of the reasons for and against circumcision, which significantly influence parental decision-making¹. In some communities, the practice is seen as an essential rite of passage or religious obligation, while in others, it is viewed with skepticism or outright rejection due to perceived health risks or cultural incongruities¹. For example, in dominant American culture, circumcision is often supported for reasons of hygiene, comfort, and aesthetic appeal, reflecting a broader cultural norm that assumes the procedure is beneficial¹. Conversely, in cultures like the Zulu, medical circumcision is generally not accepted, as it is seen as contrary to their traditions and cultural identity². This dichotomy highlights the interplay between subcultural values and broader societal expectations, underscoring the need for healthcare professionals to be scientifically and transculturally informed when counseling parents on circumcision choices¹. Understanding these cultural nuances is essential for providing culturally competent care and respecting the diverse perspectives that inform this deeply personal decision.

What are the historical origins of circumcision in various cultures?

The historical origins of circumcision are deeply rooted in various ancient cultures, with distinct purposes and practices evolving over time. The earliest recorded evidence of circumcision comes from ancient Egypt, where wall paintings in tombs depict the procedure, indicating its practice as far back as 4000 years ago³. This practice was not limited to Egypt; it was also prevalent among the Semites, who, along with Egyptians, are considered some of the earliest practitioners of circumcision⁴. In South America, circumcision likely began as a ritual for blood sacrifice or to test bravery and endurance among tribes, illustrating its role in rites of initiation and societal expectations⁴. Such diverse applications of circumcision are evident in its spread across different regions and cultures, including the Sumerians and Jews, where it served multiple functions, from hygiene to spiritual covenant, as documented in the practices introduced by Abraham⁵. The ritualistic aspect of circumcision, seen in places like Oceania and among the Bantu tribes, underscores its significance in marking transitions within the community, whether from childhood to adulthood or as a sign of belonging to a particular group⁴. These examples highlight the multifaceted nature of circumcision, reflecting its adaptation to meet the socio-cultural and religious needs of each society. Consequently, understanding the historical contexts and varying motivations behind circumcision can provide a comprehensive perspective on its continued relevance and practice across the globe.

How does circumcision impact cultural identity and community belonging?

In many African cultures, male circumcision is deeply intertwined with notions of cultural identity and community belonging. For instance, among the Meru in Kenya and communities in Guinea-Bissau and Senegal, circumcision is a prerequisite for attaining full societal status⁶. This rite of passage is seen not merely as a physical transformation but as an entry into a new social stratum. Only circumcised boys are granted the ability to fully participate in social aspects of life, thereby linking the act of circumcision with community involvement and social integration⁶. The societal implications are profound; within the Varemba people, uncircumcised individuals are considered perpetually young and are not held accountable for their actions, which affects their social status and responsibilities⁶. This demarcation fosters a sense of exclusion for those who are not circumcised, manifesting in various forms of discrimination, such as being assigned menial tasks or being rebuked for trivial offenses⁶. Moreover, circumcision is not just a personal milestone but a communal one; among the Masai and Bukusu in Kenya, circumcised men are recognized as warriors and later granted elder status once they have children who are also circumcised⁶. This intricate web of social roles and expectations underscores how circumcision serves as a cornerstone for cultural identity and community belonging. Therefore, understanding these dynamics is crucial for addressing the broader implications of circumcision on cultural identity and social cohesion.

Medical Implications of Circumcision:

What are the medical benefits and risks associated with circumcision?

Circumcision has been shown to provide several notable health benefits, including a reduced risk of HIV infection, penile carcinoma, and urinary tract infections, as well as protection against ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases⁷. These health advantages are particularly significant in regions with high prevalence rates of such infections, suggesting that circumcision can have substantial public health benefits⁸. However, these potential benefits must be weighed against the possible harms and complications associated with the procedure. Surgical risks such as bleeding, penile injury, and local infection are notable, with complications occurring in approximately 0-3% of all circumcisions, which can include issues like excessive skin removal, adhesions, and cysts^7,8. Moreover, complications can also arise from the anaesthetics used during the procedure, further adding to the potentia⁹. Ensuring the procedure is performed in a safe and sterile environment by highly trained professionals is crucial to minimize these risks⁸. Additionally, it is vital to consider the timing of the procedure, as neonatal circumcision tends to have a lower complication rate compared to circumcisions performed on older children or adults¹⁰. In conclusion, while circumcision offers significant health benefits, careful consideration and measures must be taken to mitigate the associated medical risks and ensure the procedure’s safety and efficacy.

How do medical professionals’ perspectives on circumcision vary globally?

Within the medical community, perspectives on circumcision are highly divergent, influenced by both clinical observations and cultural contexts. Urologists often advocate for neonatal circumcision, citing the benefits of preventing more complex medical interventions in adulthood and reducing the risk of conditions such as balanitis, HIV infection, paraphimosis, and penile carcinoma¹¹. However, this stance is not universally shared among all clinicians. Pediatricians and OB-GYNs express more hesitation, primarily due to their firsthand experiences with the immediate side effects and complications following the procedure¹¹. This divergence reflects the broader global disparity in circumcision practices, where varying medical protocols and cultural norms further complicate a consensus¹². Understanding these disparities is crucial as it allows physicians to address genitourinary health more comprehensively and anticipate potential long-term adverse events, thus enhancing patient care¹². Furthermore, being aware of these global practice variations enables healthcare providers to better understand and respect the health backgrounds of international patients, fostering a more inclusive and empathetic medical practice¹². This multifaceted issue underscores the need for ongoing dialogue and reevaluation of circumcision policies, ensuring that medical recommendations are both evidence-based and culturally sensitive.

What are the long-term health outcomes of circumcision?

Despite its ancient origins and cultural significance, the practice of circumcision has garnered significant attention in modern medical discourse for its long-term health outcomes. One of the most compelling arguments in favor of circumcision is its substantial public health benefits, which have notably increased in recent years¹⁰. For instance, evidence indicates that male circumcision can significantly reduce the risk of contracting sexually transmitted infections, including a 60% reduction in HIV, a 30% decrease in genital herpes, and a 35% reduction in high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) ¹⁰. These statistics underscore the potential for circumcision to play a critical role in public health strategies aimed at minimizing the prevalence of these infections. Furthermore, circumcision may lower the risk of urinary tract infections in children, providing a preventive measure against this common pediatric health issue¹³. However, it is crucial that parents are equipped with comprehensive, evidence-based information about both the risks and benefits of circumcision to make informed choices for their children¹⁰. Consulting with healthcare providers can provide parents with the necessary guidance to navigate the complexities of this decision¹³. Therefore, while the historical context of circumcision is rooted in cultural practices, its contemporary implications for health cannot be overlooked. Health organizations and the medical community should proactively communicate these benefits to foster informed decision-making among parents¹⁰.

DISCUSSION

The comprehensive analysis of circumcision practices and perspectives presented in this paper highlights the intricate interplay between cultural, medical, and ethical dimensions surrounding the procedure. Cultural patterns significantly shape individual perceptions of circumcision, evidenced by the diversity of beliefs and practices among different communities. The findings demonstrate that family backgrounds and cultural contexts create a complex landscape where decisions regarding circumcision are influenced by both traditional values and contemporary norms. This complexity is further complicated by the dichotomy observed in American culture, where circumcision is often justified on the grounds of hygiene, comfort, and aesthetic appeal, contrasting sharply with communities that reject the practice due to perceived health risks or cultural incongruities. Such disparities underscore the necessity for healthcare professionals to adopt a culturally competent approach when engaging with parents about circumcision, ensuring that they are informed not only of the health benefits—such as the reduction of urinary tract infections—but also of the cultural significance that the procedure may hold in their community. While the historical roots of circumcision can be traced back to ancient civilizations, its contemporary implications extend into the realm of public health, necessitating a nuanced understanding by medical practitioners who must navigate the tension between subcultural values and broader societal expectations. Limitations of this study include the potential biases in the selection of cultural contexts and the reliance on subjective interpretations of circumcision’s significance. Future research should aim to explore the perspectives of underrepresented communities and examine longitudinal outcomes associated with circumcision in relation to different cultural practices. By addressing these gaps, researchers can contribute to a more holistic understanding of circumcision that respects cultural identities while advocating for informed healthcare decisions. Ultimately, this discussion emphasizes the need for ongoing dialogue between healthcare providers and communities, fostering an environment where informed choices can be made that honor both medical insights and cultural beliefs.

CONCLUSIONS

1. Circumcision is a complex and multifaceted practice that carries significant cultural, medical, and ethical implications. This review highlights the diverse perspectives surrounding circumcision, demonstrating how it is deeply rooted in historical traditions, religious beliefs, and social customs. While circumcision remains a significant rite of passage in many cultures, its medical justification and ethical acceptability continue to be the subject of global debate. Understanding the cultural significance of circumcision is essential to respecting the beliefs and values of various communities while also considering individual rights and informed decision-making.
2. From a medical standpoint, circumcision has been associated with certain health benefits, including reduced risks of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), urinary tract infections, and penile cancer. However, these benefits must be weighed against the potential risks, including surgical complications, pain, and psychological effects. The medical necessity of routine circumcision remains inconclusive, with varying recommendations from global health organizations. The disparity in medical perspectives underscores the need for further research to clarify the long-term health impacts of circumcision, particularly when performed on infants versus consenting adults.
3. Ethical considerations surrounding circumcision focus primarily on issues of autonomy, consent, and bodily integrity. While proponents argue that circumcision provides public health benefits and aligns with parental rights to make medical decisions for their children, opponents emphasize the child’s right to bodily autonomy and question the necessity of performing an irreversible procedure without informed consent. Legal and ethical frameworks vary significantly across countries, reflecting the ongoing global debate about whether circumcision should be a personal, religious, or medical decision, and under what circumstances it should be performed.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Ultimately, circumcision remains a deeply debated practice that requires careful consideration of cultural traditions, medical evidence, and ethical principles. Future discussions on the subject should prioritize education, open dialogue, and evidence-based decision-making to ensure that individuals and parents can make informed choices about circumcision. Further research is needed to explore alternative, less invasive preventive healthcare measures while also addressing the ethical complexities of non-therapeutic circumcision in minors. A balanced and respectful approach that considers both individual rights and cultural traditions will be essential in shaping future policies and medical guidelines on circumcision.

BIBLIOGRAFÍA

1. Harris CC. Cultural Values and the Decision to Circumcise. Image–the journal of nursing scholarship [Internet]. 1986 Sep 1 [cited 2024 Nov 6];18(3):98–104. Available from: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/98140/j.1547-5069.1986.tb00554.x.pdf
2. Khumalo-Sakutukwa G, Lane T, van-Rooyen H, Chingono A, Humphries H, Timbe A, et al. Understanding and addressing socio-cultural barriers to medical male circumcision in traditionally non-circumcising rural communities in sub-Saharan Africa. Culture, Health & Sexuality [Internet]. 2013 Oct [cited 2024 Nov 6];15(9):1085–100. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3810456/
3. Williams RK, Lauro HV, Davis PJ. Anesthesia for General Abdominal and Urologic Surgery. Elsevier eBooks [Internet]. 2017 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Nov 6];1(1):789-816.e4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-34125-7.00030-9
4. Pinto K. Circumcision Controversies. Pediatric Clinics of North America [Internet]. 2012 Jun 22 [cited 2024 Nov 7];59(4):977–86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2012.05.015
5. Brook I. Infectious Complications of Circumcision and Their Prevention. European Urology Focus [Internet]. 2016 Oct [cited 2021 Nov 23];2(4):453–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2016.01.013
6. Matumbu O, Chimininge V. Voluntary medical male circumcision versus religio-cultural circumcision and initiation rites: The case of Varemba of Mwenezi district in response to the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in Zimbabwe. Theologia Viatorum [Internet]. 2019 Oct 31 [cited 2024 Nov 6];43(1):10. Available from: https://theologiaviatorum.org/index.php/tv/article/view/3/37
7. Moses S, Bailey RC, Ronald AR. Male circumcision: assessment of health benefits and risks. Sexually Transmitted Infections [Internet]. 1998 Oct [cited 2024 Nov 6];74(5):368–73. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1758146/
8. Covarrubias L. Circumcision: The Health Benefits and Risks [Internet]. National Center for Health Research. 2013 [cited 2024 Nov 6]. Available from: https://www.center4research.org/circumcision-health-benefits-risks/
9. Abbas T, McCarthy L. Foreskin and penile problems in childhood. Surgery (Oxford) [Internet]. 2019 Mar 6 [cited 2024 Nov 7];37(4):231–Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2019.01.010
10. Tobian AAR, Gray RH. The Medical Benefits of Male Circumcision. JAMA [Internet]. 2011 Oct 5 [cited 2024 Nov 6];306(13):1479. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3684945/
11. Warees WM, Anand S, Rodriguez AM. Circumcision [Internet]. PubMed. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 [cited 2024 Nov 6]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535436/
12. Gologram M, Margolin R, Lomiguen CM. Need for Increased Awareness of International Male Circumcision Variations and Associated Complications: A Contemporary Review. Cureus [Internet]. 2022 Apr 26 [cited 2024 Nov 6];14(4). Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9135584/
13. Cleveland Clinic. What Is Circumcision? [Internet]. Cleveland Clinic. 2024 [cited 2024 Nov 6]. Available from: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/procedures/circumcision