Infections and dermatological complications following plastic surgery. Assessing risk factors and management strategies

Nº de DOI:10.34896/RSI.2025.27.19.001

AUTHORS

1. Walter Fernando Franco Reyes. General Practitioner. Attached to the Junquillal Salitre Health Centre. Independent Researcher at the Matilde Hidalgo of Procel Research and Teaching Department. Graduate of the University of Guayaquil. (Guayaquil-Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9972-074X
2. Kevin Horacio Illescas Ochoa. General Practitioner. Attached to the Teodoro Maldonado Carbo Hospital. Graduate of the University of Guayaquil. (Guayaquil-Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2272-6104
3. Dhara Veruska Mendieta Díaz. General Practitioner. Attached to Private Clinics of Ecuador. Graduated from the University of Guayaquil. (Manabí -Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3808-3866
4. Carlos Xavier Cabrera Angüisaca. General Practitioner. Attached to the Catacocha Basic Hospital. Graduate of the University of Cuenca. (Cuenca-Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3366-4151
5. Celene Lisseth Larcos Herrera. General Practitioner. Master in Education, Technology and Innovation. Attached to the Zapotillo Health Centre. Graduate of the Central University of Ecuador. (Latacunga-Ecuador). https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3479-6206

ABSTRACT

This research paper aims to provide a deeper understanding of the challenges faced by both patients and healthcare providers in the realm of plastic surgery, ultimately seeking to enhance patient care and improve surgical outcomes.

KEY WORDS

Plastic surgery, postoperative infections, dermatological complications, wound healing, risk factors and management strategies.

RESUMEN

Este artículo de investigación tiene como objetivo proporcionar una comprensión más profunda de los desafíos que enfrentan tanto los pacientes como los proveedores de atención médica en el ámbito de la cirugía plástica, buscando en última instancia mejorar la atención al paciente y mejorar los resultados quirúrgicos.

PALABRAS CLAVE

Cirugía plástica, infecciones postoperatorias, complicaciones dermatológicas, cicatrización de heridas, factores de riesgo y estrategias de manejo.

INTRODUCTION

Plastic surgery has become increasingly prevalent, offering individuals the opportunity to enhance their physical appearance and address various aesthetic concerns. However, as with any surgical intervention, the risk of infections and dermatological complications poses significant challenges that can impact patient outcomes and satisfaction. Understanding the multifaceted risk factors associated with post-operative infections is crucial; these include patient-related factors such as age, comorbidities, and behavioral habits, as well as surgical techniques and the environments in which procedures are performed. Moreover, the spectrum of dermatological complications that can arise following plastic surgery, ranging from minor irritations to severe skin infections, necessitates a comprehensive examination of how specific surgical techniques contribute to these issues and how individual patient skin types may exacerbate or mitigate risks. Effective management strategies are paramount in addressing these complications, encompassing prevention measures to minimize infection rates and protocols for the treatment of dermatological issues. By systematically analyzing the interplay between risk factors, complications, and management strategies.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a deeper understanding of the challenges faced by both patients and healthcare professionals in the field of plastic surgery, with the ultimate goal of improving patient care and surgical outcomes.

METHODOLOGY

In conducting this scientific review on infections and dermatological complications following plastic surgery, a comprehensive and systematic methodology is employed to ensure the inclusion of relevant, high-quality literature. The review begins by identifying key research questions focused on the incidence, risk factors, clinical manifestations, and management strategies associated with postoperative infections and skin-related complications in plastic surgery patients. A thorough search is performed using major electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The search strategy incorporates a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH) and keywords such as «plastic surgery», «postoperative infections», «dermatological complications», «wound healing», «risk factors» and «management strategies.»

Inclusion criteria consist of peer-reviewed articles published in English within the last 15 years, covering human subjects and focusing on both elective and reconstructive plastic surgical procedures. Exclusion criteria include case reports, editorials, and studies with limited methodological quality or lacking relevance to the primary objectives of this review. The selection process is carried out in two stages: an initial screening of titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review of eligible studies. Data are extracted systematically and include study design, population characteristics, types of surgical procedures, types and incidence of complications, risk factors, treatment approaches, and clinical outcomes.

Findings are synthesized thematically, emphasizing the most frequently reported infections (e.g., cellulitis, abscesses, necrotizing fasciitis) and dermatological issues (e.g., delayed wound healing, scarring, skin necrosis), as well as prevention and treatment modalities. This methodology allows for a critical evaluation of existing literature and aims to provide healthcare professionals with a well-rounded understanding of the challenges and solutions in managing dermatological complications following plastic surgery.

RESULTS

Risk Factors for Infections Following Plastic Surgery:

What are the common risk factors associated with post-operative infections in plastic surgery?

In the realm of plastic surgery, understanding the common risk factors associated with post-operative infections is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. One of the most significant risks is the potential for a postoperative infection, which remains a prevalent concern among both patients and surgeons¹. These infections can be influenced by various patient-related factors, such as obesity, which is a well-established risk factor for surgical site infections in plastic surgery². Obesity not only complicates the surgical procedure itself but also affects the body’s healing capacity, thereby increasing susceptibility to infections. Furthermore, the pattern of infections can vary significantly depending on the surgical procedure and the operative approach taken³. For instance, more invasive procedures or those involving longer operative times may have higher infection rates due to greater tissue manipulation and exposure. Additionally, geographical location plays an integral role, as it can influence the prevalence and types of infectious agents patients are exposed to, thus affecting post-operative infection rates³. This variability underscores the importance of tailoring preoperative and postoperative care to address these regional differences effectively. Ultimately, categorizing the risk factors into patient and procedural factors allows for a more comprehensive assessment and management strategy, leading to improved prevention and treatment protocols for postoperative infections in plastic surgery³. Addressing these factors through careful patient evaluation and procedural planning is essential to minimize the risk and enhance surgical outcomes.

How do patient-related factors contribute to the risk of infections?

Patient-related factors significantly contribute to the risk of infections, particularly in the context of postoperative settings such as plastic surgery. These factors include underlying medical conditions, age, and the general health status of the patient, which are crucial in determining susceptibility to infections⁴. For instance, individuals with compromised immune systems, whether due to existing conditions or treatments like chemotherapy, are at increased risk for infections, as these factors interfere with the body’s natural ability to combat pathogenic invasions [5][4]. Additionally, the presence of existing injuries or conditions that compromise skin integrity can provide direct pathways for pathogens, thereby escalating the risk of postoperative infections⁵. Moreover, the severity of the patient’s illness, which correlates with the length of hospital stay and exposure to invasive devices, further amplifies the infection risk, underlining the need for meticulous assessment and tailored nursing care plans to mitigate these risks^4,6. It is imperative to incorporate patient-specific factors into infection prevention strategies to enhance patient outcomes and reduce the prevalence of healthcare-associated infections.

What role do surgical techniques and environments play in infection risk?

The interplay between surgical techniques and the environment is pivotal in determining the risk of infections during surgical procedures. A key factor is maintaining a clean and sterile surgical environment, as it serves as the bedrock for preventing infections⁷. This is achieved through strict adherence to cleaning protocols and the use of effective disinfectants, which are vital in ensuring that the operating room remains free from pathogens⁷. Despite the inherent cleanliness of operating rooms, pathogens can still be present, posing a significant threat to patients and potentially hindering recovery, particularly in relation to wounds⁸. To mitigate these risks further, regular cleaning and disinfection of surfaces and equipment are essential practices that help eliminate microorganisms and reduce the potential for contamination⁷. Additionally, surgical environments should implement proper ventilation systems to minimize airborne contamination, which is a known contributor to surgical site infections⁹. Surgical techniques also play a crucial role, where aseptic methods are necessary to reduce infection risks during operations¹⁰. This comprehensive approach, which integrates both advanced surgical techniques and meticulously maintained environments, is vital in significantly reducing the incidence of surgical site infections¹¹. Ultimately, these efforts not only enhance patient safety but also contribute to more successful surgical outcomes by minimizing the infection risk and promoting better recovery¹⁰.

Dermatological Complications Post Plastic Surgery:

What are the common dermatological complications observed after plastic surgery?

Dermatological complications following plastic surgery are multifaceted, stemming from both procedural intricacies and patient-specific factors. Nodules and lumps are frequently observed complications associated with the use of dermal fillers, often resulting from improper injection techniques or the use of suboptimal materials¹². While many lesions that manifest post-surgery are transient and considered an inherent part of the recovery process, they necessitate proper evaluation to prevent escalation into more severe conditions¹³. The role of antiseptic solutions in preoperative preparation cannot be overstated, as ensuring these solutions are fully dry before commencing surgery significantly reduces the risk of adverse skin reactions¹³. Additionally, bleeding, a common complication in dermatologic procedures, can evolve into critical issues such as hematoma, infection, and skin necrosis, especially when compounded by mechanical factors like hypertension and trauma¹⁴. The potential for skin necrosis is particularly heightened in patients who smoke, have diabetes, or are overweight, necessitating careful preoperative assessment and postoperative monitoring to manage this risk effectively¹⁵. Overall, these complications underscore the importance of meticulous surgical technique, comprehensive patient evaluation, and diligent postoperative care in mitigating dermatological issues after plastic surgery.

How can surgical procedures lead to specific dermatological issues?

Surgical procedures, while often necessary for treating various dermatological conditions, can inadvertently lead to specific skin issues due to multiple interrelated factors. One of the most common dermatological problems arising during such procedures is the formation of skin lesions, primarily due to the incorrect application of antiseptic solutions¹³. This highlights the critical need for meticulous care in the preparation stage of surgery to prevent such outcomes. Additionally, the manipulation of wound edges and improper suture placement can lead to ischemic conditions that compromise dermal capillary blood flow, thereby increasing the risk of infection¹⁴. Such infections are a significant concern as they not only affect the immediate recovery process but can also alter the cosmetic appearance of surgical scars¹⁶. Moreover, the occurrence of post-operative hematomas, although rare, has been documented more frequently in cases involving flap and graft reconstruction, suggesting that specific surgical techniques might predispose patients to these complications¹⁷. Overall, these insights underscore the importance of implementing stringent protocols and careful surgical practices to minimize dermatological issues and ensure optimal patient outcomes.

What is the impact of patient skin type on the likelihood of dermatological complications?

The impact of patient skin type on the likelihood of dermatological complications is a multifaceted issue that requires a tailored approach in medical practice. Individuals with darker skin types, specifically those classified under Fitzpatrick skin types IV, V, and VI, often encounter unique challenges and risks when undergoing dermatological treatments, particularly cosmetic procedures like laser therapy and chemical peels¹⁸. These treatments pose a higher risk of adverse reactions in pigmented skin due to increased melanin, which can lead to complications such as post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation^18,19. Moreover, traditional dermatological practices and manufacturer-recommended parameters for various procedures are primarily based on clinical trials involving lighter skin types, creating a significant gap in safety data for darker-skinned individuals¹⁸. This discrepancy can result in a lack of comprehensive understanding and preparation among clinicians when addressing the specific needs of these patients¹⁹. To mitigate such risks, it is imperative that dermatologists possess an in-depth knowledge of the potential complications associated with different skin types and engage in effective counseling to educate patients about suitable cosmetic procedures¹⁸. By acknowledging the diversity in skin types and tailoring interventions accordingly, healthcare providers can enhance patient safety and improve satisfaction outcomes in dermatological care for patients with varying skin tones.

Management Strategies for Post-Surgery Complications

What are the effective management strategies for preventing infections post-surgery?

Effective management strategies for preventing infections post-surgery involve a multifaceted approach that integrates both preventive and responsive measures. One critical strategy is the continuous monitoring of the surgical site for potential causes of infections, which can greatly enhance the early detection and treatment of any signs of infection²⁰. In addition to monitoring, the prompt removal of drenched dressings is essential, as such dressings can provide a breeding ground for bacteria, thereby increasing the risk of infection²⁰. Moreover, comprehensive post-operative care plays a pivotal role in safeguarding patients from surgical site infections long after the surgery is completed, ensuring that the wound is managed properly and any potential complications are swiftly addressed²⁰. Regular cleaning of the wound by medical staff or caregivers is another vital component of holistic wound care, helping to prevent infections by maintaining a sterile environment around the wound²⁰. Emphasizing the need for skilled personnel in managing the postoperative phase, these strategies collectively highlight the importance of a well-coordinated care plan that involves continuous assessment, appropriate interventions, and the collaboration of healthcare teams to effectively prevent postoperative infections²¹.

How can dermatological complications be managed and treated post-operatively?

Postoperative management of dermatological complications requires a multifaceted approach, emphasizing the importance of careful follow-up care and effective communication with patients¹⁴. Careful follow-up care is crucial in identifying and addressing complications early, enabling prompt intervention that can prevent more severe issues from developing¹⁴. Educating patients on recognizing and reporting adverse events promptly further enhances the efficacy of management strategies, as early detection is key to successful treatment¹⁴. These educational efforts should be complemented by open discussions about potential surgical risks, fostering a transparent relationship that encourages patient cooperation and trust¹⁴. Moreover, a sound surgical technique is fundamental in minimizing postoperative complications, as it lays the groundwork for effective healing and reduces the likelihood of adverse outcomes¹⁴. Despite the limited studies available, the consensus is that prophylactic topical antibiotics should be avoided, as they offer no significant benefit and may contribute to complications²². Instead, alternative wound care options such as petrolatum or silicone gel have been found to provide similar results with lower complication rates²². Overall, the integration of these strategies underscores the necessity for both clinical precision and patient-centered communication to optimize postoperative outcomes in dermatologic procedures.

What protocols should be followed to minimize risk and manage complications effectively?

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study underscore the critical need to understand and address the multifaceted risk factors associated with post-operative infections in plastic surgery. As highlighted, patient-related factors such as obesity, age, and underlying medical conditions emerged as significant contributors to infection susceptibility, reinforcing the importance of tailored preoperative assessments. This aligns with existing literature that emphasizes the correlation between patient health status and surgical outcomes, suggesting that individualized patient management strategies could mitigate risks. Furthermore, the variability of infection risk based on surgical type and duration calls for a nuanced approach to surgical planning and execution, particularly for more invasive procedures where infection rates are elevated. The geographical differences in infectious agents also warrant consideration of localized protocols for preoperative and postoperative care, ensuring that strategies are relevant to the specific patient population. The role of surgical techniques and environmental factors cannot be overstated; our findings stress the necessity of maintaining rigorous sterile practices in the operating room to counteract the persistent threat of pathogens. While educational initiatives aimed at informing patients about potential complications are vital, further exploration into effective communication strategies and their impact on patient outcomes is necessary. The study also identifies gaps in the current management of dermatological complications, particularly regarding the use of prophylactic antibiotics, which challenges conventional practices and suggests a shift towards alternative wound care solutions. Limitations of this study include the potential biases in patient reporting and the variability in surgical techniques employed across different practitioners. Future research should focus on developing standardized protocols that encompass all identified risk factors and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in real-world settings. A systematic and proactive approach to risk management, as advocated in this research, is essential not only for enhancing patient safety but also for fostering continuous improvement in the quality of care within the field of plastic surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

1. Infections and dermatological complications remain significant concerns in plastic surgery, impacting patient outcomes and recovery. This comprehensive review highlights the multifactorial nature of these complications, with risk factors including patient-related factors (such as diabetes, smoking, and immunosuppression), surgical-related factors (such as wound tension, surgical technique, and implant use), and environmental factors (such as hospital hygiene and post-operative care). The incidence of infections, including cellulitis, abscesses, and more severe complications like necrotizing fasciitis, varies depending on the procedure and the patient’s risk profile. Additionally, dermatological issues such as delayed wound healing, scarring, and skin necrosis are common and can significantly affect aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction.
2. Effective prevention and management strategies are critical in reducing these complications. Optimizing preoperative care, including proper patient selection, smoking cessation, and management of comorbidities, is essential. Intraoperative techniques, such as sterile practices, judicious use of drains, and careful handling of tissues, help minimize infection risk. Postoperative care, including appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis, vigilant monitoring for signs of infection, and prompt intervention when complications arise, plays a key role in improving outcomes. Furthermore, strategies like wound care protocols, use of advanced dressing materials, and techniques to optimize scar healing contribute to reducing dermatological complications.
3. While much progress has been made in understanding the risk factors and developing management protocols, challenges remain in individualizing care for high-risk patients and further improving clinical outcomes. Future research should focus on identifying novel biomarkers for early detection of infections, exploring advanced wound-healing technologies, and refining surgical techniques to prevent dermatological complications. By adopting a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to patient management, plastic surgeons can continue to reduce the incidence of infections and enhance aesthetic and functional outcomes for their patients.

REFERENCES

1. Saldanha OR, Salles AG, Llaverias F, Saldanha Filho OR, Saldanha CB. Predictive factors for complications in plastic surgery procedures – suggested safety scores. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica (RBCP) – Brazilian Journal of Plastic Sugery [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2025 Apr 9];29(1). Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.5935/2177-1235.2014RBCP0018
2. De Sousa A. Concerns about cosmetic surgery. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics [Internet]. 2007 Oct [cited 2020 Jan 22];4(1). Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2007.068
3. Zabaglo M, Sharman T. Postoperative Wound Infection [Internet]. PubMed. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 [cited 2025 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560533/
4. Collins A. Preventing Health Care–Associated Infections [Internet]. Nih.gov. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 [cited 2025 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2683/
5. Caruso S. Risk for Infection Nursing Diagnosis & Care Plan [Internet]. NurseTogether. 2025 [cited 2025 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.nursetogether.com/risk-for-infection-nursing-diagnosis-care-plan/
6. Moore R. How Does Infection Risk Differ By Healthcare Setting? [Internet]. www.performancehealthacademy.com. 2020 [cited 2025 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.performancehealthacademy.com/how-does-infection-risk-differ-by-healthcare-setting.html
7. Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008 . Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology [Internet]. 2019 Feb [cited 2025 Apr 9];31(2):107–17. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/650197
8. Wood A. Infection Prevention: A Perioperative Nurse’s Guide to preventing surgical site infections [Internet]. Aorn.org. Association of periOperative Registered Nurses; 2024 [cited 2025 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.aorn.org/article/infection-prevention–a-perioperative-nurses-guide-to-preventing-surgical-site-infections
9. Cristina M, Sartini M, Shinca E, Ottria G, Spagnolo A. Operating room environment and surgical site infections in arthroplasty procedures. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene [Internet]. 2016 Sep [cited 2025 Apr 9];57(3):E142. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5139609/
10. Cherney K. Aseptic Technique: Uses, Benefits, and Complications [Internet]. Healthline. 2018 [cited 2025 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.healthline.com/health/aseptic-technique
11. Agodi A. Principles of Infection Prevention and Control in Surgery. Updates in surgery/Updates in surgery series [Internet]. 2024 Oct 14 [cited 2025 Apr 9];1(1):37–46. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60462-1_5
12. Urdiales-Gálvez F, Delgado NE, Figueiredo V, Lajo-Plaza JV, Mira M, Moreno A, et al. Treatment of Soft Tissue Filler Complications: Expert Consensus Recommendations. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery [Internet]. 2018 Jan 5;42(2):498–510. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-1063-0
13. Borrego L. Acute Skin Lesions After Surgical Procedures: A Clinical Approach. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas (English Edition) [Internet]. 2013 Nov [cited 2025 Apr 9];104(9):776–81. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adengl.2013.04.014
14. Semchyshyn NL. Dermatologic Surgical Complications. eMedicine [Internet]. 2020 Dec 23 [cited 2025 Apr 9];1(1). Available from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1128404-overview
15. Brooklyn Staughton. Skin Necrosis – Possible Post Surgery Complication for Plastic Surgery [Internet]. Plastic Surgery Hub. 2022 [cited 2025 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgeryhub.com/blogs/skin-necrosis-possible-post-surgery-complication-for-plastic-surgery/
16. Jiménez Puya R, Vázquez Bayo C, Gómez García F, Moreno Giménez JC. Complications in Dermatologic Surgery. Actas Dermosifiliogr [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2025 Apr 9];100(1). Available from: https://www.actasdermo.org/index.php?p=revista&tipo=pdf-simple&pii=S1578219009701489
17. Strickler AG, Shah P, Bajaj S, Mizuguchi R, Nijhawan RI, Odueyungbo M, et al. Preventing and managing complications in dermatologic surgery: Procedural and postsurgical concerns. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology [Internet]. 2021 Apr 1 [cited 2025 Apr 9];84(4):895–903. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2021.01.037
18. Dos Santos Sandes SM, Costa MF, Dos Santos GV, De Freitas LP, Pedroza de Vasconcelos AC, Lôbo Silva L de S. Lesões provenientes de procedimento cirúrgico: fatores relacionados. Revista SOBECC [Internet]. 2019 Sep 23 [cited 2022 Jun 14];24(3):161–7. Available from: https://revista.sobecc.org.br/sobecc/article/download/479/pdf_1/2646
19. Burgess CM. Cosmetic procedure complications in darker skin. wwwdermatologytimescom [Internet]. 2020 Oct 29 [cited 2025 Apr 9];41(1). Available from: https://www.dermatologytimes.com/view/cosmetic-procedure-complications-in-darker-skin
20. NICE. Surgical site infections: prevention and treatment [Internet]. 2019 Apr [cited 2025 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng125/resources/surgical-site-infections-prevention-and-treatment-pdf-66141660564421
21. Andersen BM. Prevention of Postoperative Wound Infections. Prevention and Control of Infections in Hospitals [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2025 Apr 9];1(1):377–437. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7122543/
22. Sanchez-Puigdollers A, Toll A, Morgado-Carrasco D. “Postoperative wound care in dermatologic surgery: update and narrative review.” Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas [Internet]. 2024 Sep 1 [cited 2024 Dec 13];115(10). Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2024.09.014